What types of transportation do you use during an average week, and how has this shaped your view of transportation policy?

In a typical week, my approach to transportation is diverse and reflective of the various options available in our district. Born and raised on the south side of Chicago, I have a deep appreciation for the intricacies of urban transit. I prioritize walking and public transit when possible, utilizing the L train system and buses as much as I can. Growing up I found myself taking the L train system and the Jeffrey 6 bus back and forth to school everyday. Despite my effort to use public transit I do also have a personal vehicle. Driving as often as I do has really given me perspective into the reliance of our urban planning on personal vehicles. Furthermore, post-Covid I have grasped the need to emphasize alternative means of transportation not just in the city, but the state. Since the pandemic there have been delays in operations, infrequent operations, and decreased ridership seemingly undermining a sense of urgency.

What are some transportation challenges in your district?

Challenges regarding transportation within my district are varied. With River North and the Loop falling in my district many constituents are concerned about the hindrance in CTA operations in the wake of the pandemic. For those that commute to downtown for work, this has proven to be a stressor. For those in the southern past of my district such as in Woodlawn, there are concerns regarding fare cost and accessibility. Additionally, with several colleges in my district there is a strong need for bike lanes and non-vehicle infrastructure that we should consider revamping.

How can the State of Illinois address the impending combined $700 million fiscal cliff facing the CTA, Metra, and Pace in a way that ensures sustained and adequate funding for the future?

The $700 million fiscal cliff is for CTA, Metra, and Pace requires urgent action. The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning’s Plan of Action for Regional Transit has provided insightful prospects to address the cliff. It is imperative that measures taken are responsive and respectful of taxpayers, but also reevaluate the state’s priorities regarding transit. Public transit is an issue that is at the intersection of the environment, low income communities, and the economy.

I am committed to exploring prospective changes to institute on the state level, including adjustments to funding and matching obligations based on review of agency and rider needs. I also would examine equipping the Regional Transportation Authority with the necessary resources to fulfill core operations.

A federal rule allows for states to flex up to 50% of federal highway funds towards transit instead. New Jersey currently flexes 15%, and California flexes 12% compared to Illinois at just under 3%. Would you make any changes to this amount, and if so why?

I would welcome a commission that would study what an adequate adjustment would be, and would collaborate with members on the transportation committees to see the viability of an increase.

The Illinois Department of Transportation (“IDOT”) plays a significant role in transportation throughout the state and in Chicago. What is your opinion on their relationship with the Chicago Department of Transportation, local communities, and the impact that has?

I believe that strong collaboration and coordination between IDOT is what would yield the greatest outcomes for residents that utilize public transportation. This past December IDOT was able to provide $10 million to the City of Chicago for public safety cameras along state routes and streets. When there are clear and coordinated actions being taken, this is in the best interest of the general populace.

How do you view the Illinois General Assembly’s role in setting IDOT’s priorities for public transit, passenger rail, and strengthening accessibility in transportation?

The General Assembly plays a large role in agenda setting with respect to IDOT’s priorities. IDOT is responsible for ensuring the execution of initiatives authorized by the general assembly. As such, legislators need to be responsive to the needs of their community when introducing legislation that would be executed through IDOT.

What is your position on IDOT’s current proposals for rebuilding North Du Sable Lake Shore Drive?

IDOT’s current proposals address in various capacities: climate change, public safety, and transit times. There is still room for improvements in their plans, but their approach includes very necessary opportunities for public hearings and community input. As an elected official it is my job to listen to my constituents and work with leaders in the community to advocate for policies that are reflective of their values. I would welcome the opportunity to collaborate with Better Streets Chicago on projects such as the revamping of DuSableLake Shore Drive.